Add new comment

Those are resonable arguments for the PPS; although with a custom fitted suit you can get away with a bit of tailoring to hide it. My point with the whole comparision is this: In order for the PPS to have the benefit of the Glock, (IE., ammo capacity), it has to give up its advantages, and then some. The Glock is a standard 10 round mag and to have the same, you would have to take the 8 round mag for the PPS. In doing so you give up the weight and height advantage advantage (although the Glock is 4.17" to the PPS 4.4, with the 7 round mag so it already wins ïn that aspect), and you STILL don't have the equal number of rounds (30 vs. 24 based on the standard carry of 3 mags). I can go with the whole "not fighting off an army" argument as well. Agreed. Having said that, you don't need ammunition until you NEED ammunition BADLY! There are no "timeouts" in a gunfight. Aside from concealment, and if your life depended on it, which would you choose?